Case Analysis
BY PER OMDAL FROM NORWAY, UEFA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER.
Source: "The technician", UEFA newsletter.
Source: "The technician", UEFA newsletter.
"IF I WAS ASKED TO FIND ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE ONE OF THE MAIN DIFFERENCES I HAVE NOTICED IN 25 YEARS OF COACHING," GÉRARD HOULLIER REMARKED AT THIS YEAR'S ELITE
CLUB COACHES FORUM,
"THE WORD WOULD PROBABLY BE 'WHY'? TODAY'S PLAYERS WANT TO KNOW THE REASONS BEHIND EACH SESSION ON THE TRAINING GROUND - AND, OF COURSE,
YOU HAVE TO BE READY TO GIVE THEM A GOOD ANSWER."
At today's multilingual professional club, this can become even more demanding - which is why some technicians, 'Takis' Lemonis among them, now open the proceedings with an explanatory talk, either on the training pitch or in the dressing room. Pragmatisms apart, the coaches at the forum emphasised that modern footballers tend to be top-level students of the game and, in order to attain maximum levels of motivation, need to feel involved and, to a degree, responsible for the shape of training exercises. José Mourinho voiced the opinion of many coaches when he said he encourages feedback from his players and prefers to implement a 'guided discovery' strategy on the training ground. "Sometimes an exercise starts in one way and finishes in a totally different way," he commented.
Everybody has his or her modus operandi but the clear message was that the days of "just do what I say" are past history.
It was a theme which cropped up again at the UEFA Coach Education Symposium in London, attended by representatives from all 53 member associations and, in addition, colleagues from FIFA and the other confederations. There was a clear consensus that, in today's dressing-room climate, the technician is required to devise training exercises which are motivating, interesting and totally relevant to matchplay.
"The important thing is to start with clear objectives that you can explain to the players," José Mourinho commented in Nyon. "And then you design the exercise to attain those objectives. But you want input from the players and, like matches, exercises can start in one way and end in a different way. But everything must be game-related. The game is the end, so it should also be the beginning."
"I use a global method," he told Andy Roxburgh during a recent interview. "I use direct methods when preparing our organisation but I also use guided discovery where I create the practice, dictate the aim and then invite the
players to come up with different solutions. My practices are aimed at developing an aspect of my team's play- they are specific for my style of football. Sometimes I decide I won't use a certain practice again because I am sure I can devise a better one with this specific outcome in mind."
During his time at Chelsea FC, José enjoyed the luxury of brand-new training facilities at Cobham - and one of the features he regarded as basic was the ability to conduct training sessions on two adjacent pitches. "This allows you to prepare exercises in advance without having to stop working to move cones or change goals. Players can simply switch from one pitch to the other, taking some fluid in the meantime, and that allows you to conduct a 95-minute session with match- like intensity. That has a big influence on the players' levels of concentration."
Some would argue that a peak-of-the- pyramid club like Chelsea are not the perfect example in that many of the players have been acquired rather than developed. Zico, who was poised to make his UEFA Champions League debut with Fenerbahçe SK, admitted that his training programme focuses as much on the development of the individual as on the construction of a winning team. "It's important to go back regularly to basics and to make the player feel responsible for his actions," he said. Claude Puel endorsed his viewpoint. "When you have a young squad like we have at Lille," he explained, "there is a need to develop players. Training therefore becomes an educational process as well as the means of preparing for a specific game. This is why competing in the Champions League was important. It helped us to raise standards."
"I think this is why many of us complain that we don't have enough time," FC Porto's Jesualdo Ferreira added. "Today's fixture list barely leaves us enough training time to prepare for matches, let alone work on player development. In my average week, the emphasis is firmly on team tactical work rather than anything else."
"The objectives are usually tactical variations for a specific game," Ottmar Hitzfeld agreed. "If you have time, you work on attacking and defensive patterns, passing options and transition. And to make training sessions successful, you need a fitness trainer who has hundreds and thousands of exercises!"
The role of the fitness coach was a theme which cropped up again in London. "Top-level football is so important," Gérard Houllier commented with a smile, "that we have to be careful about how much we leave to the fitness coach..."
For Gérard, the training ground is one of the places where the personality of the coach - as well as his methods -become highly relevant. "Today's play ers are usually top-level students of the game. They want to ask questions about what happens when we meet opponents who do this or do that. And the training ground is where the coach's philosophy and enthusiasm are passed on to the players."
At the symposium in London, Gérard stressed the importance of building your entire season as a coherent training project aimed at raising the level of competence, building confidence and mutual trust among the players and establishing a culture of constant progress and improvement. Both he and Ottmar Hitzfeld also highlighted the need for training sessions to combine fun and efficiency.
But what is efficiency? Is it simply measured by the next result? These are two of the many questions posed in Nyon by Arsène Wenger, a restless mind if ever there was one. "It's correct to say that we have limited time in comparison with other sports. So what is the most efficient way of using, for example, a one-hour session? Sometimes I think that a training session has been good. But that's a subjective assessment. How can we objectively measure the effectiveness of a session? What is the best way for us, as coaches, to work on aspects such as vision or reading the game? I still cannot unravel the mystery of exactly what makes a player suddenly improve and develop."
Sir Alex Ferguson maintains "a top coach needs an imagination - we all want to be the coach that created the perfect goal". Arsène would surely love to be the coach who created the perfect training session...
